This paper focuses on the relationship between decision trees, a typical machine learning method, and data anonymization. It is known that information leaked from trained decision trees can be evaluated using well-studied data anonymization techniques and that decision trees can be strengthened using k-anonymity and ℓ-diversity; unfortunately, however, this does not seem sufficient for differential privacy. In this paper, we show how one might apply k-anonymity to a (random) decision tree, which is a variant of the decision tree. Surprisingly, this results in differential privacy, which means that security is amplified from k-anonymity to differential privacy without the addition of noise.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Waseda et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: