This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
We present volume-limited samples of cataclysmic variables (CVs) and AM CVn binaries jointly selected from SRG/eROSITA eRASS1 and Gaia DR3 using an X-ray + optical color-color diagram (the ``X-ray Main Sequence"). This tool identifies all CV subtypes, including magnetic and low-accretion rate systems, in contrast to most previous surveys. We find 23 CVs, 3 of which are AM CVns, out to 150 pc in the Western Galactic Hemisphere. Our 150 pc sample is spectroscopically verified and complete down to LX = 1.3× 10²⁹ \;erg s⁻¹ in the 0.2--2.3 keV band, and we also present CV candidates out to 300 pc and 1000 pc. We discovered two previously unknown systems in our 150 pc sample: the third nearest AM CVn and a magnetic period bouncer. We find the mean LX of CVs to be LX ≈ 4.6× 10³⁰ \;erg s⁻¹, in contrast to previous surveys which yielded LX ~ 10³¹-10³² \;erg s⁻¹. We construct X-ray luminosity functions that, for the first time, flatten out at LX~ 10³⁰ \; erg s⁻¹. We find average number, mass, and luminosity densities of ρN, CV = (3.7 ± 0.7) × 10⁻⁶ pc⁻³, ρM = (5.0 ± 1.0) × 10⁻⁵ M_⁻¹, and ρLX = (2.3 ± 0.4) × 10²⁶ erg s⁻¹M_⁻¹, respectively, in the solar neighborhood. Our uniform selection method also allows us to place meaningful estimates on the space density of AM CVns, ρN, AM CVn = (5.5 ± 3.7) × 10⁻⁷ pc⁻³. Magnetic CVs and period bouncers make up $35%$ and $25%$ of our sample, respectively. This work, through a novel discovery technique, shows that the observed number densities of CVs and AM CVns, as well as the fraction of period bouncers, are still in tension with population synthesis estimates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rodriguez et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: