Recent JWST observations of very early galaxies, at z ≥ 10, has led to claims that tension exists between the sizes and luminosities of high-redshift galaxies and what is predicted by standard ΛCMD models. Here we use the adaptive mesh refinement code Enzo and the N-body smoothed particle hydrodyanmics code SWIFT to compare (semi-)analytic halo mass functions against the results of direct N-body models at high redshift. In particular, our goal is to investigate the variance between standard halo mass functions derived from (semi-)analytic formulations and N-body calculations and to determine what role any discrepancy may play in driving tensions between observations and theory. We find that the difference between direct N-body calculations and halo mass function fits is less than a factor of two within the mass range of galaxies currently being observed by JWST and is therefore not a dominant source of error when comparing theory and observation at high redshift.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
O'Brennan et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: