Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract The deployment of the health workforce, carried out through initial and subsequent posting and transfer (PT), is a key element of health workforce management. However, the focus of the currently available PT literature is mostly on subsequent PT, and the distinction between initial and subsequent PT has received little research attention. Drawing on this gap, in this paper, we examine how doctors experience their subsequent PT compared with their initial postings in two states in India. The distinctions have been drawn using the prism of six norms that we developed as evidence for implied policy in the absence of documented policy. This mixed-methods study used in-depth interviews of doctors and key informants, with job histories providing quantitative data from their accounts of their PT experience. Based on the interviews of these frontline doctors and other key policy actors, this paper brings to light key differences between initial and subsequent postings as perceived by the doctors: compared with initial postings, where the State demands to meet service needs dominated, in subsequent postings, doctors exercised greater agency in determining outcomes, with native place a central preoccupation in their choices. Our analysis provides a nuanced understanding of PT environment through this shift in doctors’ perceptions of their own position and power within the system, with a significant change in the behaviour of doctors in subsequent PT compared with their initial postings. The paper brings to light the changing behaviour of doctors with subsequent PT, providing a deeper understanding of PT environment, expanding the notion of PT beyond the simple dichotomy between service needs and doctors’ requests.
Purohit et al. (Mon,) studied this question.