This paper proposes a Reynolds number [Formula: see text] scaling for the number of grid points [Formula: see text] required in wall-modeled Large Eddy Simulation (WMLES) of turbulent boundary layers (TBL) to accurately capture the regions of flow separation. Based on the various time scales in a nonequilibrium TBL, a definition of the near-wall “underequilibrium” scales is proposed (in which “equilibrium” refers to a quasi balance between the viscous and the pressure gradient terms). This length scale is shown to vary with Reynolds number as [Formula: see text]. A-priori analysis demonstrates that the resolution ([Formula: see text]) required to reasonably predict the wall stress in several nonequilibrium flows is at least [Formula: see text], irrespective of the Reynolds number and Clauser parameter. Further, a-posteriori studies (on the Boeing speed bump, Song– Eaton diffuser, Notre-Dame Ramp, and the backward-facing step) show that scaling [Formula: see text] such that [Formula: see text] is independent of Reynolds number results in accurate predictions of separation for the same “nominal” grid across different Reynolds numbers. Finally, we suggest that near separation and reattachment points, [Formula: see text] for WMLES scale as [Formula: see text], which is more restrictive than the previous estimates ([Formula: see text]) by Choi and Moin (Choi, H., and Moin, P., “Grid-Point Requirements for Large Eddy Simulation: Chapman’s Estimates Revisited,” Physics of Fluids, Vol. 24, No. 1, 2012, Paper 011702) and Yang and Griffin (Yang, X. I. A., and Griffin, K. P., “Grid-Point and Time-Step Requirements for Direct Numerical Simulation and Large-Eddy Simulation,” Physics of Fluids, Vol. 33, No. 1, 2021, Paper 015108).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Agrawal et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: