For a given spectral curve, the theory of topological recursion generates two different families ωg,n ωg,n and ωg,n^ ωg,n∨ of multi-differentials, which are for algebraic spectral curves related via the universal x-y x−y duality formula. We propose a formalism to extend the validity of the x-y x−y duality formula of topological recursion from algebraic curves to spectral curves with exponential variables of the form e^x=F(e^y) ex=F(ey) or e^x=F(y)ea y ex=F(y)eay with F F rational and a a some complex number, which was in principle already observed in [Commun. Number Theory Phys. 13, 763 (2019); J. Lond. Math. Soc. 109, e12946 (2024)]. From topological recursion perspective the family ωg,n^ ωg,n∨ would be trivial for these curves. However, we propose changing the n=1 n=1 sector of ωg,n^ ωg,n∨ via a version of the Faddeev’s quantum dilogarithm which will lead to the correct two families ωg,n ωg,n and ωg,n^ ωg,n∨ related by the same x-y x−y duality formula as for algebraic curves. As a consequence, the x-y x−y symplectic transformation formula extends further to important examples governed by topological recursion including, for instance, Gromov-Witten invariants of C^3 ℂ3 (or, equivalently, triple Hodge integrals), orbifold Hurwitz numbers, and stationary Gromov-Witten invariants of P^1 ℙ1 . The proposed formalism is related to the issue topological recursion encounters for specific choices of framings for the topological vertex curve.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alexander Hock (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: