The accurate prediction of the nonlinear flutter response is one of the important prerequisites for accurately evaluating the post-flutter performance of long-span bridges. In fact, as the vibration amplitude increases, the participation of lateral degree-of-freedom (DOF) will become more and more obvious and thus ignoring self-excited forces related to lateral vibration may no longer be applicable. To this end, based on 18 amplitude-dependent flutter derivatives (FDs), a 3-DOFs coupled nonlinear flutter analysis method was proposed in this study. Then, 18 amplitude-dependent FDs of two typical bridge decks were identified, and they were used to calculate the 3-DOF coupled nonlinear flutter responses based on the proposed flutter analysis method. Meanwhile, the correctness of the above flutter analysis method was also verified by compared with the numerical simulation results. Finally, the influence and mechanism of the lateral DOF, structural modal parameters and amplitude-dependent FDs on the nonlinear flutter of these typical bridge decks were investigated. The results show that when the torsional amplitude of the nonlinear flutter is large, the participation of lateral DOF will significantly increase the steady-state amplitude of the nonlinear flutter, and the larger the torsional amplitude, the more significant this increase is. The main reason is the participation of the lateral DOF introduces the negative coupled aerodynamic damping to the system, which then reduces the stability of the system. Besides, for the twin-box section, the influence of the lateral DOF on the nonlinear flutter is relatively smaller compared with the single-box section since the proportion of negative aerodynamic damping by the lateral DOF is smaller. Compared with the single-box section, the mass of the twin-box section has a smaller effect on the critical wind speed, and the torsional structural damping ratio of the twin-box section has a greater effect on the nonlinear flutter.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: