Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The costs of participating in training programs that rely on video conferencing vary by mechanics of use and the specific platform. We proposed practical solutions to limiting costs in low resource settings with the use of video conferencing calls. Scenarios in which facilitators have their video on and expect learners to participate with continuous video result in the greatest data burden, while use of intermittent video by both facilitator and learners can significantly lower data use, and thus costs. The choice of a platform also impacts teleprogramming, with creative options for use of lower cost platforms to reduce participant and training organization costs. These might include sharing educational content or video via chat groups and limiting conference to audio alone. In the context of COVID-19 where virtual meetings have become prevalent, it is critical that data burden is considered by program directors and funders. Looking forward, hybrid training that includes virtual and in-person training will likely become the norm in global health settings, but achieving this model will still require thoughtful consideration of data costs. Further, our findings are relevant to many other fields and advocate for evaluation of costs and data burden along with the growing use of teleprogramming in these settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Umoren et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: