⌘+K

Pulse Explore Clubs Researchers Journals

Home Clubs Explore

August 22, 2024Clinical Oral Implants ResearchOpen Access

A 7.5‐year randomized controlled clinical study comparing cemented and screw‐retained one‐piece zirconia‐based implant‐supported single crowns

Riccardo D. Kraus Jenni Hjerppe Nadja Naenni Marc Balmer Ronald E. Jung Daniel S. Thoma

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Abstract

To compare marginal bone levels, biological, and technical outcomes of screw-retained versus cemented all-ceramic implant-supported zirconia-based single crowns after an observation period of 7.5 years.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Kraus et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5b4dfb6db64358754d898 https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14346

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Clinical Efficacy of Cemented Versus Screw‐Retained Zirconia Single Crowns: A Systematic Review and Meta‐AnalysisMeta-Analysis · 2026
2Cemented vs screw‐retained zirconia‐based single implant reconstructions: A 3‐year prospective randomized controlled clinical trialCohort Study · 2019 · 36 citations
3Retrospective, Multi-center, Cohort Study Evaluating Clinical, Technical, Biological, and Esthetic Outcomes of Implant Supported Zirconia Single Crowns Cemented on Titanium-base Abutments: 7-year Mean Follow-up2024
4Zirconia versus Titanium Implants: 1‐year Prosthetic Outcome of Screw‐Retained Single Crowns in a Randomized Clinical TrialCohort Study · 2026
5Monolithic Zirconia Single Crowns Supported by Narrow or Standard Diameter Titanium-zirconium Implants in Posterior Sites: One-year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial2024