There is a rapid growth in the volume of data in the cancer field and fine-grained classification is in high demand especially for interdisciplinary and collaborative research. There is thus a need to establish a multi-label classifier with higher resolution to reduce the burden of screening articles for clinical relevance. This research trains a multi-label classifier with scalability for classifying literature on cancer research directly at the publication level. Firstly, a corpus was divided into a training set and a testing set at a ratio of 7:3. Secondly, we compared the performance of classifiers developed by “PubMedBERT + TextRNN” and “BioBERT + TextRNN” with ICRP CT. Finally, the classifier was obtained based on the optimal combination “PubMedBERT + TextRNN”, with P= 0.952014, R=0.936696, F1=0.931664. The quantitative comparisons demonstrate that the resulting classifier is fit for high-resolution classification of cancer literature at the publication level to support accurate retrieving and academic statistics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: