Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this article, the design and estimate of the collapse risk of safe-to-fail steel and reinforced concrete (RC) frames due to earthquakes were proposed. The frames are part of nuclear facility buildings, and their failures are to follow the safe-to-fail beam side-sway collapse mechanism. The safe-to-fail was dictated by allowing plastic hinges to form merely in beams and few in columns; no other failure but flexure was tolerated such as shear, local or lateraltorsional buckling. Two types of safe-to-fail frames were studied, one with special moment frame (SMF) and the other with ordinary moment frame (OMF). The design was elaborated, and the fragility-based collapse risks were estimated and compared. Nonlinear time history analyses were carried out to evaluate the structural performance. The analyses showed that the safe-to-fail OMF had lower collapse risk than the safe-to-fail SMF for both steel and concrete frames. The steel safe-to-fail OMF showed superior behaviours.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mangkoesoebroto et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: