High temperature (200-260°C) military composite engine components made of carbon fiber thermoset materials are susceptible to erosion damage. Evidenced by wear seen during operation, erosion protection remains a challenge for composites in the engine air flow path. In this paper, we investigate polyetheretherketone (PEEK), thermoplastic polyimide (TPI), and ceramic fabric (Nextel™) as potential high temperature erosion coatings for thermoset polyimide composite engine components. We evaluate the erosion protection materials for two qualities: (1) co-moldability with thermoset polyimide composite panels, and (2) erosion resistance to a sandblasting test. Autoclave and compression molding were used to test co-moldability with different manufacturing methods. The compression molding process was optimized to reduce surface defects using a pre-imidization step before the erosion protection layer was applied and final cure was completed. Co-molded test panels were cut into small coupons for sandblasting. After 60 s of alumina sandblasting PEEK had negligible mass loss, whereas the TPI and ceramic fabric had roughly the same erosion rate as the uncoated polyimide laminate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smith et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: