Objective: Impaired angiogenic responses to ischemia underlie diabetic vascular complications. Reconstituted high-density lipoproteins (rHDL) have proangiogenic effects in diabetes. The pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 4 (PDK4)/pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (PDC) axis is an oxygen-conserving mechanism that preserves EC functions in hypoxia. We aimed to determine the role of the PDK4/PDC axis in angiogenesis, the effect of diabetes on its regulation in response to ischemia, and in the proangiogenic properties of rHDL. Approach and Results: In a murine wound healing model, PDK4 and pPDC were elevated early (24h) post induction of wound ischemia in non-diabetic wounds, which did not occur in diabetic mice. Topical rHDL rescued this impairment, enhancing PDK4 (68%, P<0.05) and pPDC (165%, P<0.01) in diabetic wounds. In parallel, wound neovascularization (62%, P<0.05) and closure (154%, P<0.0001) were increased in diabetic rHDL-treated wounds. In vitro, PDK4 and pPDC levels were increased in ECs exposed to hypoxia (65%, 70% respectively, P<0.05). High glucose did not elicit a further step-wise induction in PDK4/pPDC, with aberrant increases in mitochondrial respiration (19%, P<0.05), coupled with impaired EC angiogenic functions. Importantly, rHDL increased PDK4 and pPDC two-fold, returning mitochondrial respiration and EC angiogenic functions to normal glucose levels. In vitro, PDK4 siRNA knockdown attenuated the proangiogenic effects of rHDL. In vivo PDK4 inhibition ameliorated topical rHDL-mediated increases in wound angiogenesis and closure. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation, rHDL increased forkhead box O1 (FOXO1) binding to the PDK4 promoter and suppressed FOXO1 phosphorylation, presenting FOXO1 as a mechanism for the induction of PDK4 by rHDL. Conclusion: The PDK4/PDC axis response to ischemia is impaired in diabetes and important for the proangiogenic effects of rHDL.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Primer et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: