Ebola disease is a lethal viral hemorrhagic fever caused by ebolaviruses within the Filoviridae family with case fatality rates of up to 90%. Monoclonal antibody (mAb) based therapies have shown great potential for the treatment of EVD. However, the potential emerging ebolavirus isolates and the negative effect of decoy protein (secreted glycoprotein, sGP) on the therapeutic efficacy of antibodies highlight the necessity of developing novel antibodies to counter the threat of Ebola. Here, 11 fully human mAbs were isolated from transgenic mice immunized with mucin-like domain-deleted GP ectodomain (EBOV GPΔmuc) and recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus-bearing GP (rVSV-EBOV GP). These mAbs were divided into five groups according to their germline genes and exhibited differential binding activities and neutralization capabilities. In particular, three antibodies, 8G6, 2A4, and 5H4 were cross-reactive and could bind at least three ebolavirus glycoproteins. mAb 4C1 not only exhibited neutralizing activity but no cross-reaction with sGP. mAb 7D8 exhibited the strongest neutralizing capacity. Further analysis on the critical residues for the bindings of 4C1 and 8G6 to GPs was conducted using antibodies heavy- and light-chains complementarity-determining regions (CDRs) alanine scanning. It has been shown that light chain CDR3 plays a crucial role in binding and neutralization and that any mutation in CDRs could not improve the binding of 4C1 to sGP. Importantly, mAb 7D8, 8G6, and 4C1 provided complete protection against EBOV infection in a hamster lethal challenge model when administered 12 hours post-infection. These results support mAb 7D8, 8G6, and 4C1 as potent antibody candidates for further investigations and pave the way for further developments of therapies and vaccines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: