Objective Near‐infrared autofluorescence (NIRAF) characteristics of parathyroid glands in primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT) vary, with unclarity regarding the underlying mechanism. Similarly, 99m Tc‐sestamibi uptake in diseased parathyroid glands is variable. There is a suggestion that oxyphilic cell content may influence both imaging modalities. This study aims to analyze the relationship between NIRAF imaging characteristics, 99m Tc‐sestamibi uptake, and cellular composition in pHPT. Study Design Retrospective analysis of an Institutional Review Board‐monitored prospective database. Setting Single tertiary referral center. Methods NIRAF characteristics of parathyroid glands of patients with pHPT between 2019 and 2024 were compared with 99m Tc‐sestamibi scan findings from a prospective database. Using third‐party software, brightness intensity and heterogeneity index (HI) of the glands were calculated. A subgroup of parathyroid glands obtained from consecutive patients with pHPT in 2020 to 2021 underwent histological analysis. Results A total of 428 patients with 638 diseased parathyroid glands were analyzed. Forty‐seven percent of the glands showed an uptake on 99m Tc‐sestamibi scans. The brightness intensity of the NIRAF signals from parathyroid glands that were seen versus not seen on sestamibi was 2.1 versus 2.3 ( P = .002) and HI 0.18 versus 0.17 ( P = .35), respectively. On multivariate analysis, low autofluorescence intensity, high gland volume, and single adenoma were associated with detectability on 99m Tc‐sestamibi scan ( P < .0001). Intraglandular adipose tissue content was lower in diseased glands that were detected on 99m Tc‐sestamibi scans (0% vs 5%, P < .0001). Conclusion Our findings indicate an inverse relationship between autofluorescence intensity and detectability on 99m Tc‐sestamibi scans and a lack of correlation between different cell types and autofluorescence properties.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Akgun et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: