Integrally equivalent number fields admit a natural correspondence of abelian extensions. It is natural to ask which aspects of the extensions' arithmetic are invariant under this bijection. We show that corresponding extensions share many of the same features enjoyed by arithmetically equivalent fields, despite not generally being arithmetically equivalent themselves. In the process of elaborating on this, we observe that arithmetically equivalent fields have the same odd K-groups, and we prove a simple lemma allowing for quick proofs of theorems characterizing Kronecker and weak Kronecker equivalence. We also extend a group cohomological result of Arapura et. al. and conclude with a geometric application.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shaver Phagan (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: