Abstract Aim To investigate the impact of tamoxifen treatment coverage, CYP2D6 inhibitors, CYP2D6*4 genotype, and non-genetic parameters on the outcomes of tamoxifen treated female breast cancer patients. Method We retrospectively included 3218 female patients who initiated tamoxifen following a diagnosis of breast cancer with long-term follow-up (median 7.5 years). A subgroup analysis of 303 genotyped patients with a median follow-up of 9.7 years was also conducted. The outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS) and breast-cancer-specific survival (BCS). Results In the whole cohort, a 10% increase in tamoxifen coverage over a six-month period was associated with a 27% increase in OS (HR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.71–0.0.75, P < 0.001) and a 30% increase in BCS (HR: 0.7, 95% CI: 0.67–0.73, P < 0.001). In the genotyped subgroup, CYP2D6*4 heterozygotes had a 76% greater risk of all-cause mortality than *4 non-carriers (HR: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.07–2.9, P = 0.025). For breast cancer-specific mortality, CYP2D6*4 heterozygotes and homozygotes had increased risk by 3.7-fold (HR: 3.7, 95% CI: 1.32–10.6, P = 0.01) and 11.6-fold (HR: 11.6, 95% CI: 1.3–103.5, P = 0.03), respectively. Conclusion Our study demonstrates that carriers of CYP2D6*4 have a higher risk of both all-cause and breast cancer-specific mortality and indicates that longer follow-up time may be crucial to determining impact. The shorter follow-up in previous studies may be a key reason for the conflicting results. A large real-world pharmacogenomic study with long-term follow-up is warranted to determine the impact of CYP2D6 genotyping and its implications for clinical decision making.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Almatrafi et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: