This chapter critically examines the concept of "optimal development" and its application to poverty, highlighting the limitations of a Western-centric approach that often disregards the cultural, historical, and present realities of communities with disadvantages. By framing poverty in purely economic terms, conventional models fail to account for its multifaceted nature, including psychological and social dimensions. The commodification of practices like mental health services and self-care, driven by capitalist forces, exacerbates barriers for impoverished individuals, further alienating them. The paper argues for a social justice-oriented developmental psychology that emphasizes cultural sensitivity, respects diverse lived experiences, and promotes sustainable, localized practices. By challenging the dominant narratives, we call for an epistemological shift towards more inclusive and holistic approaches to addressing poverty and development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carriere et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: