PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 15, 2024Sci4 citationsOpen Access

The Gaussian Plume Model Equation for Atmospheric Dispersion Corrected for Multiple Reflections at Parallel Boundaries: A Mathematical Rewriting of the Model and Some Numerical Testing

View Full Paper
AMAlfred MicallefCMChristopher Micallef

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The well-known Gaussian plume model has proven to be very useful in simulating the atmospheric dispersion of air pollutants (both gaseous and particulates). Nevertheless, the nature of the model presents problems in the actual computation of concentrations when the plume is confined between two parallel boundaries due to the occurrence of multiple reflections. The ground and temperature inversion lid (especially, when the inversion layer is at low levels in the atmosphere) with a chimney stack releasing the effluent below the latter, is one contextual example of horizontal parallel reflecting boundaries. A second example is buildings confining a roadway on either side, with motor vehicles emitting pollution within the street canyon (or urban notch). In such cases, multiple reflections should be accounted for, otherwise the model underpredicts the resulting concentration. This paper presents a mathematical rewriting of the Gaussian plume model equation corrected for multiple reflections when the pollution source is confined between parallel boundaries. The obtained result is most appropriate when the parallel boundaries are rigid, and near-complete reflection is achieved, e.g., street canyon environment (second quoted example). It is worth noting that the relevant mathematical derivations and definitions are all included in the paper to facilitate reading and to ensure comprehensiveness in the presentation. Additionally, the outcome of some preliminary numerical testing is presented. The latter indicates that the new formulation is mathematically stable and yields interesting results. Further numerical investigation and experimental evaluation are merited.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Micallef et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5c0efb6db643587558a0dhttps://doi.org/10.3390/sci6030048
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Development and evaluation of simple models for the flow, turbulence and pollutant concentration fields within an urban street canyon1986 · 231 citations
  2. 2User's manual for DWNWND: an interactive Gaussian plume atmospheric transport model with eight dispersion parameter options1980 · 1 citations
  3. 3Evaluation of roadway Gaussian plume models with large-scale measurement campaigns2013 · 37 citations
  4. 4Establishing a national standard method for operational mixing height determination2015 · 10 citations
  5. 5Mixing height determination by ceilometer2006 · 209 citations