The most recent SH0ES measurement of the Hubble constant employs corrections of type Ia supernova magnitudes due to extinction in their host galaxies. These corrections are estimated using a probabilistic model which is trained on Hubble flow (z> 0.03) supernovae and extrapolated to the calibration galaxies (those with observed Cepheids), despite the fact that the latter are selected based on criteria favouring discy and dust-rich systems. We show that this standard approach underestimates the brightness of reddened supernovae in the high stellar-mass (M> 10¹⁰\, M) calibration galaxies. This can be traced back to the fact that for these galaxies, a low total-to-selective extinction coefficient (RB~ 3) is assumed, while for the low stellar-mass analogues a more standard RB~ 4 is adopted. We propose a minimalistic modification of the extinction model in the calibration galaxies in order to alleviate this systematic effect. The modification is twofold and it involves: (i) the same, Milky Way-like distribution of RB (with mean RB of 4.3 – consistent with the extinction curve used for colour corrections of the Cepheids – and scatter 0.4) and (ii) a modified shape of the $E(B-V)$ reddening distribution while keeping the same effective slope of the supernova peak magnitude–colour relation and the same mean $E(B-V)$ reddening as measured for supernovae in the Hubble flow. We show that this new approach yields a significantly better fit (Δ BIC=-11) to the calibration data and results in a lower value of H₀. Our result is H₀=70.5± 1 km s⁻¹ Mpc⁻¹ implying a reduction of the Hubble constant tension from 5.2σ to 2.8σ.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wojtak et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: