Field analysis reveals a new species, Pinguicula panfetiae, in eastern Cuba, suggesting critical conservation needs.
Background and aims – Pinguicula is a cosmopolitan genus of carnivorous plants with more than 100 species, most of them distributed in two centres of diversity: Europe and the Central American-Caribbean region. Fourteen species are reported for Cuba. During fieldwork to study Pinguicula populations in eastern Cuba, a white-flowered taxon, previously misidentified as Pinguicula albida or Pinguicula jaraguana , was collected in the mountainous regions of the Alejandro de Humboldt National Park. This taxon represents a new species for which we present a full description, a distribution map, illustrations, photographs, and a conservation status. Material and methods – Living and preserved material of several populations of white-flowered Pinguicula from Cuba were analysed, measured, and described based on vegetative and reproductive characters. Statistical analyses were carried out to explore the differences among the collections. The preliminary conservation status of the new species was assessed based on the IUCN guidelines and criteria. Key results – Pinguicula panfetiae is described as a new species endemic to eastern Cuba. It thrives on permanently wet, ferritic soils derived from serpentine bedrocks, on slopes above the banks of the River Toa in association with surrounding semi-arid montane serpentine shrubwood (charrascal). It differs from the closely related species, Pinguicula albida and Pinguicula jaraguana , primarily by its smaller rosettes with obovate, suberect to erect leaves, non-involute leaf margins, smaller flowers up to 1–1.3 cm including the spur, longer (0.6–0.7 mm) and wider (0.18–0.22 mm) seeds, and that it grows in full sun. Conclusion – The newly described species increases the number of Pinguicula in the Cuban archipelago to 15. Pinguicula panfetiae is preliminarily assessed as Critically Endangered (CR) according to the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pančo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: