Observational analysis found CBCT detects abnormalities better than biopsy in oral lesions, suggesting less invasive diagnosis methods.
Diagnosing oral lesions accurately is challenging because conventional methods like biopsy, while reliable, are invasive, time-consuming, and may cause discomfort or complications. Therefore, it is of interest to compare the results of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) with biopsy results to assess the accuracy of CBCT in locating oral lesions. This study consisted of two groups of participants, totaling 108 individuals. Group A consisted of participants who underwent biopsy and the other group underwent imaging using CBCT. Data shows that CBCT was better at detecting abnormalities. Thus, we show that CBCT is a safe and reliable approach for checking bone involvement, malignancies, and soft tissue expansion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zarabi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: