Mixed-methods systematic review synthesizes outcomes and perceptions of creative arts-based educational practices for autistic students, highlighting gaps in research.
Literature exploring how successfully creative arts-based educational practices (CAEPs) are used with 11-19 year old autistic students depicts a positive picture. However, findings are disjointed and appear to have been framed by a corrective, pathology-focussed ideology. This mixed-methods systematic review provides an objective synthesis of evidence on the nature of CAEPs, stakeholders’ perceptions of CAEPs, and CAEP outcomes, when CAEPs are used with 11-19 year old autistic students. Following this, the discussion contextualises the synthesis within a neurodiversity affirmative paradigm, which is a novel approach in this field of research. In total, 15 qualitative, 6 quantitative and 3 mixed methods reports were identified and included in the convergent integrated qualitative synthesis, resulting in four integrated findings: (1) perceptions of autism, (2) the nature of CAEPs, (3) CAEP outcomes, and (4) barriers and facilitators. These findings will be contextualised in a discussion about the conflicts that arose during the quality appraisal process, the potential biases and the paradigmatic framing of the included reports, and the numerous gaps in research that remain.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Doyle et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: