Qualitative analysis reveals coping mechanisms and emotional challenges in only child adolescents, suggesting the need for supportive parenting.
Adolescence is a critical developmental stage marked by identity formation, emotional growth, and the development of social relationships. For only child adolescents those without siblings this period may present unique psychosocial challenges. The absence of sibling interactions can influence coping mechanisms, socialization, and emotional well-being. Research suggests that although only children spend more time alone, they do not necessarily feel lonelier; instead, they adopt distinct strategies to manage solitude and peer relationships. Objective: The objective of the study was to explore the lived experiences of only child adolescent. Method: A qualitative phenomenological approach was adopted. Using purposive and snowball sampling, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 only child adolescents aged 10?21. The semi structured interview method was used to collect socio-demographic data, and interviews were analyzed using Braun and Clarke?s thematic analysis framework. Result: Among participants, 57.14% were aged 18?19 years, 78.57% were females, and 92.85% were currently studying. Half of the fathers had secondary education, and 62.28% of mothers were graduates or higher. Most participants (78.57%) lived in rural areas and were from Hindu backgrounds (71.42%). Six major themes emerged: parental relationship, expression and autonomy, role expectations, emotional challenges, coping mechanisms, social connectivity, and benefits of being an only child. Participants described strong parental bonds but limited autonomy, faced loneliness and societal pressure, and coped through parental support, peers, and extended family. Conclusion: Only child adolescents experience emotional closeness and social expectations but show resilience and develop adaptive coping strategies, highlighting the importance of supportive parenting and community awareness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thomas et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: