Analysis compares ligand-receptor interactions in single-cell proteomics and transcriptomics, suggesting new approaches.
Distinct ligand-receptor interaction (LRI) inference tools often produce markedly different results, and their performance can vary considerably across datasets. Indeed, performance is influenced by differences in experimental designs and dataset-specific features, making it difficult to establish a universal LRI tool. To address this challenge, we expanded our SingleCellSignalR Bioconductor package to provide an integrated framework that incorporates alternative scoring strategies and adjustable analytical depth. We motivate this choice through the analysis of two single-cell transcriptomics datasets that exemplify contrasting experimental designs. Leveraging the new framework flexibility, we present a detailed analysis of paired single-cell proteomics and transcriptomics data, providing, to our knowledge, the first direct comparison of LRI inference across these complementary modalities at single-cell resolution. Finally, we demonstrate how the same framework seamlessly accommodates additional underexplored data types from the LRI perspective, including patient-derived mouse xenografts and bulk RNA sequencing of upstream-sorted cell populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Villemin et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: