Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis of epidemiological studies from Journal Ciência & Saúde Coletiva reveals evolving research themes, indicating shifts in trends.
This article aimed to analyze the Epidemiology scientific production in the Journal Ciência & Saúde Coletiva in 2024, updating a previously published article that examined publications from 1996-2002, 2011, and 2019. The selection was based on a review of the title and abstract (and, in some cases, the methods) of the original research articles and systematic reviews. One hundred twenty-five (40.1%) of the 305 articles whose title was considered were classified as epidemiological studies. Regarding the thematic classification, the three most common were “Evaluation of health systems, policies, programs, and services” (16%), “Epidemiology of accidents, violence, and physical injuries” (13.6%), and “Epidemiology of adolescent health” (9.6%). Approximately 56% were descriptive/cross-sectional studies, 24.2% focused on the adult population, 47.4% were conducted in the universe of subjects, 46.4% had more than 5,000 participants, and 40.8% were from authors from the Southeast. The results point to notable changes compared to the previous article, with a decrease in descriptive/cross-sectional studies and an increase in time series trends and sample sizes, possibly explained by the strengthening of serial population-based surveys and the use of information from Brazilian information systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Loch et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: