This review categorizes battery state estimation methods, highlighting their evolution from single to multi-state approaches.
As a critical technological foundation for electric vehicles, power battery state estimation primarily involves estimating the State of Charge (SOC), the State of Health (SOH) and the Remaining Useful Life (RUL). This paper systematically categorizes battery state estimation methods into three distinct generations, tracing the evolutionary progression from single-state to multi-state cooperative estimation approaches. First-generation methods based on equivalent circuit models offer straightforward implementation but accumulate SOC-SOH estimation errors during battery aging, as they fail to account for the evolution of microscopic parameters such as solid electrolyte interphase film growth, lithium inventory loss, and electrode degradation. Second-generation data-driven approaches, which leverage big data and deep learning, can effectively model highly nonlinear relationships between measurements and battery states. However, they often suffer from poor physical interpretability and generalizability due to the “black-box” nature of deep learning. The emerging third-generation technology establishes transmission mechanisms from microscopic electrode interface parameters via electrochemical impedance spectroscopy to macroscopic SOC, SOH, and RUL states, forming a bidirectional closed-loop system integrating estimation, prediction, and optimization that demonstrates potential to enhance both full-operating-condition adaptability and estimation accuracy. This progress supports the development of high-reliability, long-lifetime electric vehicles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: