This analysis examines measurement invariance of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 in diverse groups, indicating its validity across gender, ethnicity, and international student status.
Background: Measurement invariance on mental health outcome measures is vital to establish validity for using measures in clinical practice across varying demographics. Objective: This study analyzes the measurement invariance of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) to support its use in practice across various groups. Method: In this study we analyzed the validity of the PHQ-9 in a large college counseling sample across gender (cis-gender women and men), ethnicity (White and Hispanic / Latina/o/x), and international student status (international and domestic). The sample consisted of 4,363 participants; the gender spread of the sample was 60.9% women, 35.9% men, 11.7% other gendered or multi-gendered, 0.6% questioning or unsure, 0.5% transgendered, and 0.3% who preferred not to answer. The racial/ethnic spread of the sample was 71.2% White, 13.7% Hispanic and/or Latina/o/x, 3.6% Asian or Asian American, 2.4% African American / Black, 1.1% Pacific Islander, 0.7% Native American, 3.6% multi-ethnic, and 2.7% other. Results: Analyses demonstrated configural, metric, scalar, and residual measurement invariance as indicated by model fit indices across all groups tested using both a unidimensional and second-order model, with relevant factors in each model also demonstrating composite reliability. Limitations: The conclusions focus on the sample of a university counseling setting, as specified. Conclusions: These results support the use of the PHQ-9 to assess levels of depression across the different populations studied and an overall score.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jensen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: