⌘+K

Pulse Explore Clubs Researchers Journals

Home Clubs Explore

August 15, 2024

[Effectiveness comparison of robot-assisted and traditional freehand technology in treatment of atlantoaxial dislocation].

Haiping Zhang Dingjun Hao Baorong He Zhengwei Xu Yongchao Duan Wenlong Yang Houkun Li Changjiang Kou Ke Wang

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Abstract

To compare the effectiveness of robot-assisted and traditional freehand screw placement in the treatment of atlantoaxial dislocation.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Zhang et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5c1f9b6db64358755a033 https://doi.org/10.7507/1002-1892.202405006

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1[Comparative study of computer-assisted and robot-assisted atlantoaxial pedicle screw implantation for reversible atlantoaxial dislocation].2024 · 1 citations
2Comparison of Robot-Assisted versus Fluoroscopically Guided Treatment of Atlantoaxial Dislocation in Combination with High-Riding Vertebral Artery: A Preliminary Study2024
3Robot-assisted percutaneous cannulated screw treatment versus traditional surgical reduction fixation in the treatment of Hawkins type Ⅱ talus fracture: a retrospective study of an average two-year follow-upCohort Study · 2026
4Comparison of iCT-based navigation and fluoroscopic-guidance for atlantoaxial screw placement in 78 patients with traumatic cervical spine injuries2024 · 8 citations
5[Advances in the technology of surgical treatment for atlantoaxial dislocation].2024