Objective: This work aims to analyze a sample of the mineral Rutana, composed of two crystalline phases of titanium dioxide (TiO2): rutile and anatase, using the X-ray diffraction technique. Theoretical reference: In 1914, the German physicist Max von Laue, using a CaSO4 crystal, successfully achieved the diffraction of X-rays. Crystalline solids, such as CaSO4, consist of regular arrangements of atoms with interatomic spacings of the order of 0.1 -1.0Å, that is, with the same order of magnitude as the wavelength of X-rays. Due to the periodic nature of the internal structure of the crystals, it was possible for them to act as a three-dimensional diffraction grating, providing science with a new method for indirect investigation of the internal structure of materials: the X-ray diffraction (XRD) technique. Methodology: In this technique, a finely ground crystalline powder of a material is placed in the path of a monochromatic x-ray beam. This material, composed of a large number of small crystallites, are randomly oriented. Diffraction occurs from planes of the crystallites that are oriented at the correct angle to fulfill the Bragg condition, in such a way that localized peaks of the same intensity as the diffracted beams are formed. Results and discussion: Based on the intensity, angles and width of the diffraction peaks, the mass percentages of each of the mineral's crystalline phases were obtained: rutile (62.08%) and anatase (37.92%). Research Implications: This work presents a contribution to future research related to the chemical characterization of initially unknown samples, by providing a comprehensive and representative theoretical framework related to the XRD technique. Originality/value: This study presents practical contributions to the literature related to the application of the XRD technique in the characterization of materials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Horta et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: