SummaryBackground & AimsEpidemiological studies have indicated a potential association between dietary acid load (DAL) and the risk and prognosis of cancer; however, the evidence needs more research. Hence, we performed an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to comprehensively investigate the relationship between DAL and risk for different types of cancer.MethodsWe conducted a systematic literature search in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus databases from inception to November 2023. We calculated pooled odds risks (ORs) with 95% CIs using a random-effects model. We also conducted analyses on publication bias, subgroups, and sensitivity. This systematic review and meta-analysis included fifteen case-control studies.ResultsThe pooled OR showed a statistically significant association between potential renal acid load (PRAL) (OR: 2.73, 95%CI: 2.62–2.83, P: <0.0001) and net endogenous acid production (NEAP) (OR: 2.70, 95%CI: 2.66–2.74, P: <0.0001) and a considerably increased risk of cancer. To identify potential sources of heterogeneity, subgroup analyses were performed depending on gender and country. Iranian females showed a higher odds ratio for developing cancer, according to statistical research on the PRAL index. However, the NEAP variable revealed a higher cancer risk among Uruguayan males.ConclusionThe high DAL may be associated with an increased cancer risk and a poor cancer prognosis. We need more high-quality prospective studies to explore the connections between DAL and the risk and prognosis of specific cancers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nikpayam et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: