Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Policy optimization methods benefit from a simple and tractable policy functional, usually the Gaussian for continuous action spaces. In this paper, we consider a broader policy family that remains tractable: the q-exponential family. This family of policies is flexible, allowing the specification of both heavy-tailed policies ($q>1$) and light-tailed policies ($q<1$). This paper examines the interplay between q-exponential policies for several actor-critic algorithms conducted on both online and offline problems. We find that heavy-tailed policies are more effective in general and can consistently improve on Gaussian. In particular, we find the Student's t-distribution to be more stable than the Gaussian across settings and that a heavy-tailed q-Gaussian for Tsallis Advantage Weighted Actor-Critic consistently performs well in offline benchmark problems. Our code is available at {https://github.com/lingweizhu/qexp}.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhu et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: