Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Objectives: Inaccurate design, insertion or loading of mini-implant may lead to disturbed bone turnover and subsequent implant failure. This study assesses the two commonly used types of implants and their bone stress pattern and determines which type of implant may be more patient-compatible. Method: The samples were categorized into four groups and analyzed by scanning electron microscopy to assess the surface morphology. Stress distribution was estimated using finite element method for which three-dimensional (3D) models of the maxilla and mini-screws were prepared. The implant was then inserted 5 mm from the alveolar crest onto the buccal cortical plate of maxilla between the second premolar and first molar within the platform of Ansys Workbench software. Two loads were applied: 5 Ncm and 2 N. Evaluation of von Mises stresses in the bone was estimated. Results: The study concluded that tapered stainless steel screws exerted greater stress on the bone than titanium screws in both situations. As the diameter increased from 1.3 mm to 1.5 mm, the mini-screw displacement and stress were less. Under 2 N force, the stress was distributed around the head and neck of the mini-implant and the cortical bone. Conclusion: The assessment of von Mises stress distributed around an orthodontic mini-implant under a constant load revealed that stainless steel mini-screws generated more stress than titanium mini-screws. It was observed that the majority of the stress and strain is tolerated by the cortical bone, not the cancellous bone. The diameter of mini-screw is more significant irrespective of material composition.
Keeranthodika et al. (Mon,) studied this question.