Current cable-road layouts for timber harvesting in steep terrain are often based on either manual planning or automated layouts generated from low-resolution GIS data, limiting potential benefits and informed decision-making. In this paper, we present a novel approach to improve cable-road design using multi-objective optimization based on realistic cable-road representations. We systematically compare the effectiveness of single-objective and multi-objective optimization methods for generating layouts using these representations. We implement and evaluate the performance of a weighted single-objective approach, the AUGMECON2 and NSGA-II multi-objective methods in comparison to a layout manually created by a forestry expert, taking into account installation costs, harvesting volumes, residual stand damage and lateral yarding workload. In addition to implementing the first linear programming multi-objective optimization for realistic cable-road representations by adapting AUGMECON2, we also present the first implementation of a multi-objective genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) with simulated annealing for this purpose and evaluate their respective strengths. We find that the use of multi-objective optimization provides advantages in terms of cost-effective, balanced and adaptable cable-road layouts while allowing economic and environmental considerations to be incorporated into the design phase.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Retzlaff et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: