this paper reviews recent research on image compression techniques utilizing the Embedded Zero-Tree Wavelet (EZW) and Set Partitioning in Hierarchical Trees (SPIHT) algorithms. The study addresses the question of which algorithm, EZW or SPIHT, provides superior compression performance for various image types. The research method involves a comprehensive analysis of published research papers that employed these algorithms for image compression. The findings indicate that SPIHT generally outperforms EZW in terms of compression ratio, computational efficiency, and image quality, making it a more versatile and effective choice for various image compression applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alsoussia et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: