Literature analysis reveals geo-economic and gender disparities in AI-enabled clinical studies, highlighting the urgent need for equitable global access.
Artificial intelligence (AI) has been extensively researched in medicine, but its practical application remains limited. Meanwhile, there are various disparities in existing AI-enabled clinical studies, which pose a challenge to global health equity. In this study, we conducted an in-depth analysis of the geo-economic distribution of 159 AI-enabled clinical studies, as well as the gender disparities among these studies. We aim to reveal these disparities from a global literature perspective, thus highlighting the need for equitable access to medical AI technologies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: