Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demands on infection services have significantly increased over recent years, covering a diverse and broad range of clinical activities (Lawrence et al, 2021). This has not been accompanied by a corresponding increase in resources. The term Infection Specialist equally covers a broad and diverse range of specialities, and what is defined as one type of clinical infection review/consult may differ between infection specialists and infection services. This has also made it difficult to accurately capture clinical activity. Documentation of clinical activity may also be challenging, and also prevent accurate capture of the amount and type of activity being undertaken. This document aims to provide a standardised description of the different types of clinical infection reviews. It aims to guide referrers to the minimum information required to optimise each type of review, to optimise the consultation. There are also suggested tools which may help infection services document and capture their clinical activity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ratnaraja et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: