Randomized double-blind trial reveals faster repeated 4 km cycling performance in trained male cyclists, indicating enhanced acid-base recovery with minimal gastrointestinal discomfort.
Background A novel sodium bicarbonate (SB) product has come to market named the “Bicarb System” (M-SB; Maurten AB, Gothenburg, Sweden). It claims to minimise gastrointestinal (GI) discomfort whilst still improving exercise performance. Aim To investigate the effects of M-SB ingestion on repeated 4 km cycling time trials (TT1 and TT2) in well-trained male cyclists. Methods The study recruited ten well-trained cyclists (maximal oxygen uptake ( V̇O₂ₘₐₓ V ˙ O 2 max ): 67 ± 4 ml kg −1 min −1 BM; peak power output (PPO) at V̇O₂ₘₐₓ V ˙ O 2 max : 423 ± 21 W) to take part in this randomised, crossover and double-blinded study. Following one visit to determine V̇O₂ₘₐₓ V ˙ O 2 max , participants completed a second visit to identify individual time to peak blood bicarbonate (HCO 3 − ) (ITTP) in a rested state. Visit three was a familiarisation trial mimicking the experimental procedures. Visits four to seven consisted of completing 2 × 4 km cycling TTs separated by 45 min passive recovery, following one of either: 0.3 g kg −1 BM M-SB, 0.21 g kg −1 BM sodium chloride (placebo; PLA) in vegetarian capsules (size 00), or a control trial (CON). Supplements (M-SB or placebo) were ingested pre-exercise at their respective ITTP. Results Performance in TT1 was faster in the M-SB condition compared with TT1 in CON (− 5.1 s; p = 0.004) and PLA (− 3.5 s; p < 0.001). In TT2, performance was also significantly faster in the M-SB condition compared with CON (− 4.4 s; p = 0.018) or PLA (− 4.1 s; p = 0.002). Total aggregated GI symptoms were generally low and not significantly different between PLA and the M-SB conditions for a range of symptoms. Conclusions The ingestion of M-SB improves repeated 4 km cycling TT performance and the recovery of acid–base balance between bouts, whilst causing minimal GI discomfort.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gough et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: