Abstract Background and Aims Differences in farming practices can significantly impact the sustainable development of farmland, soil quality, and global warming potential (GWP). Although the effects of no-tillage (NT) and conventional tillage (CT) management practices on GWP have been extensively studied, their effects on the oilseed rape-rice rotation system prevalent in China, particularly the microbial regulatory mechanisms involved, remain poorly understood. Methods The study was conducted over a 2-year cycle of an oilseed rape-rice rotation system. Soil greenhouse gas emissions and carbon sequestration under NT and CT management practices were measured and compared. Additionally, high-throughput sequencing of soil methanogens and methane-oxidizing bacteria was carried out. Results Compared with CT, NT significantly reduced CH₄, CO₂, and N₂O emissions by 21.2%, 16.9%, and 19.9%, respectively, and decreased the overall GWP by 17.5%. NT also increased the carbon efficiency ratio by 37.6% and significantly boosted soil organic carbon by 8.6% over the 2-year period. High-throughput sequencing revealed that NT significantly enhanced the diversity and abundance of methane-oxidizing microorganisms and altered the abundance of dominant genera compared to CT. Conclusion NT is a viable approach to lower CH₄ emissions, enhance soil and crop carbon fixation, and increase the diversity of soil methane-oxidizing bacteria in oilseed rape-rice rotation fields. This practice offers substantial environmental benefits, contributing to the sustainable development of farmland and the mitigation of global warming potential.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: