Objective: To investigate the computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of cavernous hemangioma malformation (CHM) to enhance diagnostic accuracy. Methods: The CT and MRI findings and clinical information of 23 patients with CHM were retrospectively analyzed. Results: CT examinations were conducted in 7 cases, while MRI was utilized in 23 cases. Additionally, SWI was employed in 5 cases and enhanced imaging techniques were applied in 14 cases. Among the observed lesions, 20 cases presented with a singular lesion, whereas 3 cases exhibited multiple lesions. The lesions were located in 8 frontal lobes, 6 cerebellums, 2 brainstems, 6 temporal lobes, 1 basal ganglia, 3 parieto-occipital lobes, and 2 thalamus regions. The nodules appeared as quasi-circular lesions with clear or well-defined boundaries. They presented as isodense lesions on CT scans, with one lesion showing peritumoral edema. On MRI, T1-weighted imaging (T1WI) demonstrated isointense signals, while T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) showed isointense and hyperintense signals. Additionally, 10 lesions exhibited a low signal ring on T2WI. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) revealed nodular or isointense low signals, while susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) displayed enlarged areas of low signal. Fourteen lesions underwent contrast-enhanced scanning, with 2 lesions showing no obvious enhancement, 1 lesion demonstrating mild to moderate enhancement, and 11 lesions exhibiting significant enhancement. Notably, 6 of these enhanced lesions were surrounded by small blood vessels. Conclusion: Cavernous hemangioma malformation is more commonly found in individual cases. CT alone lacks specificity, making it prone to misdiagnosis. A more comprehensive evaluation of cavernous hemangioma malformation can be achieved through a combination of MRI, DWI, SWI, and enhanced examination, providing valuable references for clinical assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: