The lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries are considered as one of the most promising devices for next-generation energy storage applications, owing to its exceptional theoretical capacity and energy density. However, persistent challenges have hampered its performance, notably the sluggish polysulfides conversion kinetics and the polysulfides shuttling phenomenon. These issues lead to irreversible active material loss, rapid capacity decay, low coulombic efficiency, and a limited cycle life. This study demonstrates that bis(4-nitrophenyl) carbonate (BNC) can serve as an effective agent in anchoring dissolved polysulfides, thereby preventing their migration to the anode. Furthermore, this investigation indicates that BNC has the capability to modify the solvation structure of polysulfides in the electrolyte. The presence of 0.01M BNC induces a downfield shift in the 7 Li NMR spectrum, signifying a strengthened solvation structure on Li-ion. This solvation modification results in altered kinetics, specifically a reduced Li 2 S 2 /Li 2 S conversion without sacrificing capacity, as confirmed by operando X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS). Operando Raman spectroscopy reveals the suppression of long-chain polysulfides (at 400 cm -1 ) and intermediate polysulfides (at 453 cm -1 ) with 0.01M BNC, mitigating sulfur shuttling to the anode. This observation is corroborated by X-ray fluorescence (XRF) mapping. Analysis of the corresponding X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) demonstrates that both anodes and cathodes with 0.01M BNC exhibit lower levels of unconverted polysulfides over extended cycles. This improvement is attributed to the kinetic consequences resulting from solvation structure alteration. However, this investigation cautions against an indiscriminate increase in BNC concentration, as higher concentrations may lead to the over-conversion of soluble polysulfides. This nuanced understanding of the solvation structure's intrinsic mechanism, coupled with chemical reactions, provides valuable insights for practical design of Li-S batteries Figure 1
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dai et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: