New Zealand law currently relies on proof of recklessness as the gateway standard for offences that can allow the Court to impose the highest financial and other penalties under the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 (HSWA). Is the existing recklessness offence set out in section 47 of the HSWA fit-for-purpose, or would New Zealand be better served by adopting one (or both) of two available alternatives – a lower standard of gross negligence for conviction, or an additional new offence of corporate manslaughter with higher penalties in cases involving death?
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nicholson et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: