Chalcopyrite selenide single crystals and epitaxial layers (CuIn 1− x Ga x Se 2 , x = 0.00, 0.08, 0.19, 1.00) were characterized by temperature‐dependent photoreflectance (PR), photoluminescence (PL), photoluminescence–excitation (PLE), and variable excitation‐energy photoluminescence (VEPL) spectroscopy. The transition energies E a , E b , and E c of both CuInSe 2 (CIS) and CuGaSe 2 (CGS) layers sensed by PR were higher than the energies of single crystals. CuInSe 2 and CuGaSe 2 grown on GaAs(001) underlie compressive and tensile stresses, respectively, which lead to band‐gap broadening in CIS and band‐gap narrowing in CGS. The increase of the E a , E b , E c energies of tensely stressed CuGaSe 2 layers to energies higher than those of the bulk originates from the stress dependence of the non‐cubic crystal field. Band‐gap scanning of the CuGaSe 2 layer with continuous‐wave Ti:sapphire‐laser confirmed the absence of correlation between band‐gap readjustment and intrinsic defects. The energy of the band‐edge exciton E FE , in the PL‐spectra, was lower than the E a transition energy, in the PR‐spectra, which is assigned to partial quenching of Δ CF with the increase of external tensile stress by gallium‐segregation at the chalcopyrite/GaAs‐interface. The stress dependence of Δ CF is negligible in CuInSe 2 and linear, with a rate of 9 meV/100 MPa, in CuGaSe 2 . It is revealed that the energy band‐gap of photovoltaic chalcopyrite absorbers can be tuned by simultaneous built‐in and external lattice‐tuning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
D. Papadimitriou (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: