This Complete Research paper explores the attitudes and experiences of neurodivergent (ND) and neurotypical (NT) students in the context of a first-year engineering design (FYED) course where students work in teams on open-ended projects. The data set includes post-survey data from Spring 2023 and pre- and post-survey data from Fall 2023. The end of the survey asked if students self-identified as neurodivergent (having one or more of the following: ADHD, ASD, dyslexia, etc.) with the response options of yes, maybe, or no. There were 63-67% of the students who self-identified as NT. On the Fall 2023 pre-survey, confidence in technical skills, confidence in non-technical skills, public/private regard for engineering, group identification with engineering, engineering self-efficacy, and engineering commitment were similar among ND and NT students. ND students had a higher centrality of engineering to their identity than NT students. The maybe ND students had lower group identification, engineering self-efficacy, and engineering commitment compared to the NT students. On the Spring 2023 post-survey, the NT students had somewhat more positive team experiences on average compared to ND and maybe ND students. Other course experiences and self-reported learning gains did not differ significantly between ND and NT students. On the Fall 2023 post-survey, the ND student responses were generally similar to those of their NT peers. In FYED courses with significant team-based work, extra attention to team formation and/or facilitation may be beneficial. Engineering faculty should consider both the assets and the challenges that neurodivergent students face.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Angela Bielefeldt (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: