We study approximation of the embedding ₚᵐ → ∞ᵐ, 1 ≤ p ≤ 2, based on randomized adaptive algorithms that use arbitrary linear functionals as information on a problem instance. We show upper bounds for which the complexity n exhibits only a (loglog m)-dependence. Our results for $p=1$ lead to an example of a gap of order n (up to logarithmic factors) for the error between best adaptive and non-adaptive Monte Carlo methods. This is the largest possible gap for linear problems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kunsch et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: