We introduce the class of Continuous Thiele's Rules that generalize the familiar Thiele's rules {janson2018phragmens} of multi-winner voting to distribution aggregation problems. Each rule in that class maximizes ∑ᵢf(πⁱ) where πⁱ is an agent i's satisfaction and f could be any twice differentiable, increasing and concave real function. Based on a single quantity we call the 'Inequality Aversion' of f (elsewhere known as "Relative Risk Aversion"), we derive bounds on the Egalitarian loss, welfare loss and the approximation of Average Fair Share, leading to a quantifiable, continuous presentation of their inevitable trade-offs. In particular, we show that the Nash Product Rule satisfies Average Fair Share in our setting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wagner et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: