PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 1, 2024Journal of Green Building19 citations

Quantification of Carbon Potential of Construction Waste Treatment: A Case Study of Guangzhou, China

View Full Paper
JLJingkuang LiuGuangzhou UniversityXTXiaoying TanSouthern Medical UniversityJZJiaxi ZhengTechnical Institute of Physics and Chemistry

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Emission reduction in the construction sector is essential for China to achieve its carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals. Construction waste recycling represents an important step in reducing the construction industry’s carbon emissions; however, construction waste recycling potential has received little attention from the industry to date. This paper adopts the Life Cycle Assessment method, constructs a carbon potential quantification formula for different construction waste treatment modes, and evaluates the economic benefit of these methods. The study’s main results are as follows. (1) For each unit (t) of construction waste disposal, the carbon potential of close-range off-site recycling is the lowest, that of public landfill is the highest, and that of recycling is intermediate. (2) The economic benefit evaluation shows that under the same conditions, the lowest total disposal cost for construction waste per unit (t) is via recycling and resourcing, indicating that this approach combines economic benefits, environmental friendliness, and sustainability. (3) Eco-friendly bricks produced by construction waste recycling have reduced carbon potential requirements compared to traditional bricks; thus, the construction waste treatment process plays a successful role in reducing carbon potential. This study’s conclusions enrich and improve the theory of construction waste resource management and can be used as a reference basis for the government to formulate emission reduction strategies for the construction industry and provide guidance for enterprises related to construction waste recycling.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Liu et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5dc44b6db6435875718behttps://doi.org/10.3992/jgb.19.3.221
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A Bibliometric Review of Research Progress on Carbon Emissions in Recycled Concrete2026
  2. 2Efficiency of construction waste and carbon reduction in the construction industry: based on improved three stage SBM-DEA model in China2024 · 26 citations
  3. 3Investigation of Carbon Emission from Construction Waste in the Building Construction Process2026
  4. 4Assessment of Municipal Solid Waste Low-Carbon Treatment: A Case Study of Beijing2025
  5. 5Research on the Investment Mode and Path of China’s Construction Waste Resourceization Industry2024