Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Modulation of testing conditions such as resting lactate (La rest ) levels or carbohydrate intake may affect the calculation of the maximal glycolytic rate (νLa.max). To evaluate the impact of elevated La rest as well as reduced and increased carbohydrate availability on νLa.max in running sprints (RST), twenty‐one participants completed five 15‐s RST tests on a running track under five different conditions: (I). baseline: La rest ≤1.5 mmol·L −1 ; (II). Lactate+: La rest ≥2.5 mmol·L −1 ; (III). CHO − : carbohydrate intake: ≤ 1 g·kg −1 BW d −1 for 3 days; (IV). CHO+: carbohydrate intake: ≥ 9 g·kg −1 BW d −1 for one day; and (V). acuteCHO: 500 mL glucose containing beverage consumed before RST. νLa.max was significantly reduced in lactate+ and CHO− conditions compared to the baseline RST, due to a reduction in the arithmetic mean delta (∆) between La peak and La rest lactate concentration (La peak , mmol · L −1 ). AcuteCHO led to an increase in La rest compared to baseline, CHO− and CHO+ with a high interindividual variability but did not significantly reduce νLa.max. Therefore, avoiding low carbohydrate nutrition before νLa.max testing, along with carefully adjusting La rest to below ≤1.5 mmol·L‐1, is crucial to prevent the unintentional underestimation of νLa.max.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pohl et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: