In order to ascertain the combined effect of diameter ratio (d/D) and spacing ratio (L/D) on the flow around two tandem circular cylinders, a total of 43 research cases are numerically simulated using a large eddy simulation model in this study, including d/D = 0.2 (L/D = 0.80–6.00), d/D = 0.4 (L/D = 0.80–6.00), and d/D = 0.6 (L/D = 0.90–6.00) at Re = 3900. By systematically analyzing the instantaneous/time-averaged spanwise vorticity contours, the three-dimensional time-averaged Q-criterion iso-surfaces, the spanwise periodicity within the gap, and the Strouhal number (St), eight sub-flow regimes can be identified, namely, non-periodic reattachment-(1), small-scale periodic reattachment, large-scale periodic reattachment, non-periodic reattachment-(2), bi-stable flow, intermittent lock-in co-shedding, subharmonic lock-in co-shedding and no lock-in co-shedding. The occurrence of these sub-flow regimes depends on the combination of d/D and L/D. Besides, with regard to the larger downstream cylinder (DC), there are three possible dominant St values for the DC instantaneous drag coefficient (i.e. StCD-D1, StCD-D2, and StCD-D3). It is quite clear that StCD-D1 has almost the same value as StCL-D1, StCD-D2 is roughly equal to 2StCL-D1, and StCD-D3 is approximately the summation of StCL-D1 and StCL-D2, where StCL-D1 and StCL-D2 denote the primary and secondary dominant St values of the DC instantaneous lift coefficient, respectively. Additionally, various flow statistical parameters are obtained and compared for different combinations of d/D and L/D, such as the velocity, vorticity, St value, spanwise periodicity, force coefficient, base pressure coefficient, reattachment angle, and separation angle.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: