Aims To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of adjunctive lacosamide therapy against focal seizures in young children (1 month – 4 years). Methods This non‐randomized, open‐label, and self‐controlled real‐world study included 105 children (1 month–4 years) with focal seizures treated with adjunctive lacosamide therapy at Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University. Results (1) The 50% response rates at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months of follow‐up were 58.1%, 61.0%, 57.1%, and 56.2%, while the seizure‐free rates were 27.6%, 34.3%, 32.4%, and 37.1%, respectively. The 50% response rate of the first addition of lacosamide for focal seizures was much higher than the second and later added treatment at 3 months ( p = 0.038). After 1 year of follow‐up, these children showed an improvement in neurodevelopmental levels ( p < 0.05). (2) Lacosamide retention rate was 72.7% (64/88) after 1 year of follow‐up. Lack of efficacy and serious adverse events were independent risk factors for the lacosamide retention rate. (3) During adjunctive lacosamide therapy, 13 (12.4%) patients reported adverse events and five (4.7%) patients withdrew due to adverse events, including vomiting drowsiness, ataxia (0.94%), neck itching with eczema (0.94%), irritability (1.88%), and gastrointestinal discomfort (0.94%). Conclusion Adjunctive lacosamide therapy was effective, safe, and well‐tolerated in young Chinese children with focal seizures in this study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: